Mac Attack! McIntosh MA-5100 Integrated Amplifier McIntosh MR-67 Tuner JBL Studio 590
By mrgoodsound
Editor: I really knew relatively little about mrgoodsound when he came on board. After some exchanges, I became more and more surprised by the scope of his vintage interests. I am delighted he has started to write about his system and vintage equipment. I have a lot more to comment on McIntosh etc, but I'll leave that to the comments section.
12" Stentorian HF-1214 drivers |
A Transitional Phase
JBL Studio 590
Still, this model is available factory direct and often on sale for about $1,000 US a pair. For this price, I find them recommendable and superior to the large majority of commercial loudspeakers at this price point. Much has already been written about these speakers online and I will not go into too much detail other than to say I like them but yearn for better. The best review I found, complete with measurements, was published in Aussie mag AVHub here.
McIntosh MA-5100
My new (to me) MA-5100 |
The subject of today's article is from a different era, and I am fond of McIntosh gear of the 1960s and prior. The MA-5100 is gorgeous, especially with its wood grain enclosure and original fascia lighting. It has tone controls, loudness contour, old 'LP' phono equalization, and two phono inputs; all features which I use and appreciate. The sound has traces of harshness associated with early transistor equipment, but despite this it plays with great immediacy and presence. This is only once a critical volume threshold is reached, as is the case with nearly all solid-state amplifiers. However, still impressive, and perhaps the hallmark of McIntosh equipment from this era. Tonal and timbral quality is there, and the sound is not awfully washed out like modern McIntosh amplifiers. It can be used to enjoy jazz and classical. The MA-5100 was an 'entry-level' piece and can be found for reasonable prices today. It is not autoformer coupled on the output, but this is frankly an unnecessary feature, unless you advocate the use of Wilson speakers with 2 ohm impedance troughs.
McIntosh MR-67
For a classical novice, FM is a great way to not only hear new pieces, but learn more about them. In between or before playing a piece, the radio host will often give context to the music and who is performing it. I keep pen and paper handy while listening and write down the times when hearing something I like, then look up what was playing on the station's website later.
A tuner will remain a mainstay in my system for background listening, to provide a constant signal for warming up or breaking in other components, as well as when I come home from work too tired to think critically about what I want to listen to. I love this piece although I forsee myself replacing it with a Scott 310E if the opportunity presents itself. The Scott is nowhere near as pretty, but is on another echelon of FM quality compared to any McIntosh tuner. Unfortunately, good examples of the Scott are getting hard to find, and command high prices.
I am delighted by your equipment, quite after my own heart if I may say so. It sounds like it should be a reasonably good system.
ReplyDeleteJBL:
I have always been curious about these latter-day JBL towers. The lowest Stage A series, in particular the A190, have received reviews from the mainstream press. I have always wanted to hear a pair, not that they I'd use them but, as someone who's always interested in bang-for-the-buck, I am curious. Your Studio 590 is for sure quite a bit better, especially for roughly the same money.
My own experience with JBL is the same - they are less efficient than contemporaneous Altec's and Klipsch (see https://cheaptubeaudio.blogspot.com/2011/08/review-jbl-4312a-part-i.html) and a cheap solid state is one economic way to drive them well. If opportunity ever arises again, I'd not mind to continue my stacked 4312 journey (that 12" woofer is pretty good).
I am not sure at all about these 2.5 way designs. I am more than familiar with the Everest 66000 (2x 15" woofers), which employs the same topography: 2 woofers, one crossing over to the midrange and the other handling bass only. In my opinion, and that of many other people, the bass is not impressive. This is one curious aspect of JBL. Perhaps because of their studio orientation, deep bass has ALWAYS been sacrificed for a strong midbass. Klipsch, Tannoy etc all reach deeper than JBL (and TAD for that matter) inch for woofer inch.
McIntosh:
I have always been fond of the autoformer McIntosh ss amps, and still own a 2120 (with a 1-ohm post). But I an very fond of their integrated and receivers. I have owned a receiver MR-1700, very good sound (but not too powerful), whose tuner section is fantastic and tubed! It was contemporaneous with your 5100, and should sound similar.
More later,
I would very much like to own that receiver, MAC1700 (not MR-1700, MR is the tuner designation), or its predecessor MAC1500. One of these by themselves could make a very formidable heart to a bedroom/office/second system.
ReplyDeleteYou are blessed to be in Toronto, with many Classical music radios. In Montréal, we have only the CBC, no more private one and the French ''Seconde chaîne'' forgot the Classical music. Many sellers and techs always told me that 1960s amp, tubes and solid state, are not good for a daily amp. It is more like an old MG, a toy for the nice summer weekend, and it's need a full recap and setting, nothing below $1000. I should confess that I picked up from a computer shop a MR74 for $200, and I like it the better of my 4 tuners by far. But unfortunately, the tuning circuit is weak, especially with CBC because the Federal is always changing the broadcasting wave path. My question is : is it more convenient for me to looking for 1970s McIntosh. What is better, a receiver or an amplifier ?
ReplyDelete